NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
18384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+59451%
92.9 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 520 PCI
0.156 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2011
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
1
18432
Shading Units
48
576
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
29W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GF119
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-300-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
