NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA P102 100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (2520MHz vs 1683MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 440.3GB/s)
15232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+762%
92.9 TFLOPS
P102 100
10.77 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2018
GeForce 40
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
1582 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5X
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
25
18432
Shading Units
3200
576
TMUs
200
192
ROPs
80
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
250W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GP102
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
16 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
