NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 172% (2520MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
16640 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+2702%
92.9 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Boost
3.315 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 40
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
1792
576
TMUs
112
192
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.6 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.315 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
828.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
200W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Tahiti
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO2
(215-0821282)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
