Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (2520MHz vs 1837MHz)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (800W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (96GB vs 48GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 1152GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada +49%
92.9 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2024
GeForce 40
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2235 MHz
Base Clock
1665 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
HBM3e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1152GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

144
SM Count
132
-
Compute Units
-
18432
Shading Units
16896
576
TMUs
528
192
ROPs
24
576
Tensor Cores
528
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB

Theoretical Performance

483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GB100
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
208 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

800W
TDP
1000W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
9.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy