NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
18432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 800W)
Score
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2005
GeForce 40
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
-
576
TMUs
12
192
ROPs
8
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
800W
TDP
83W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
NV41
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0
