NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
14336 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Lower TDP (175W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+1034%
92.9 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2015
GeForce 40
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
HBM
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
4096
576
TMUs
256
192
ROPs
64
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
175W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Fiji
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3
