NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

VS

NVIDIA TITAN RTX

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM TITAN RTX and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN RTX 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 4 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 49% (1770MHz vs 1188MHz)

More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)

3840 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages

Lower TDP (90W vs 280W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

TITAN RTX +793%

16.31 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 950

1.825 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

TITAN RTX +713%

15148

GeForce GTX 950

1862

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

TITAN RTX +1260%

68

GeForce GTX 950

5

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

TITAN RTX +520%

124

GeForce GTX 950

20

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

TITAN RTX +473%

172

GeForce GTX 950

30

TITAN RTX

VS

GeForce GTX 950

Graphics Card

Dec 2018

Release Date

Aug 2015

GeForce 20

Generation

GeForce 900

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz

Base Clock

1024 MHz

1770 MHz

Boost Clock

1188 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1653 MHz

Memory

24GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

384bit

Memory Bus

128bit

672.0GB/s

Bandwidth

105.8GB/s

Render Config

-

72

SM Count

-

4608

Shading Units

768

288

TMUs

48

96

ROPs

32

576

Tensor Cores

-

72

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SMM)

6 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

169.9 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

38.02 GPixel/s

509.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

57.02 GTexel/s

32.62 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

16.31 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1.825 TFLOPS

509.8 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

57.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

280W

TDP

90W

600 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102

GPU Name

GM206

TU102-400-A1

GPU Variant

GM206-250-A1

Turing

Architecture

Maxwell 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

28 nm

18.6 billion

Transistors

2.94 billion

754 mm²

Die Size

228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

5.2

6.6

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs ATI Radeon X1950 GT

2

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540

3

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

4

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition

5

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs ATI Radeon X1650

6

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs AMD FirePro D300

7

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM

8

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs AMD Radeon Pro V7300X

9

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

10

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs AMD Radeon R7 250

Related News

1

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

2

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

3

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

4

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

5

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

6

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

7

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

8

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

9

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

10

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game