NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

VS

NVIDIA TITAN RTX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM TITAN RTX and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN RTX 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1770MHz vs 1695MHz)

Lower TDP (280W vs 350W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 9 months late

Larger VRAM bandwidth (936.2GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)

5888 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

TITAN RTX

16.31 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 3090 +118%

35.58 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

TITAN RTX

15148

GeForce RTX 3090 +31%

19908

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

TITAN RTX

68

GeForce RTX 3090 +36%

93

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

TITAN RTX

124

GeForce RTX 3090 +24%

154

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

TITAN RTX

172

GeForce RTX 3090 +16%

200

GTA 5 2160p

TITAN RTX

130

GeForce RTX 3090 +1%

132

GTA 5 1440p

TITAN RTX

130

GeForce RTX 3090 +40%

182

GTA 5 1080p

TITAN RTX

180

GeForce RTX 3090 +16%

209

TITAN RTX

VS

GeForce RTX 3090

Graphics Card

Dec 2018

Release Date

Sep 2020

GeForce 20

Generation

GeForce 30

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz

Base Clock

1395 MHz

1770 MHz

Boost Clock

1695 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1219 MHz

Memory

24GB

Memory Size

24GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6X

384bit

Memory Bus

384bit

672.0GB/s

Bandwidth

936.2GB/s

Render Config

72

SM Count

82

-

Compute Units

-

4608

Shading Units

10496

288

TMUs

328

96

ROPs

112

576

Tensor Cores

328

72

RT Cores

82

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

6 MB

L2 Cache

6 MB

Theoretical Performance

169.9 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

189.8 GPixel/s

509.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

556.0 GTexel/s

32.62 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

35.58 TFLOPS

16.31 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

35.58 TFLOPS

509.8 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

556.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102

GPU Name

GA102

TU102-400-A1

GPU Variant

GA102-300-A1

Turing

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

12 nm

Process Size

8 nm

18.6 billion

Transistors

28.3 billion

754 mm²

Die Size

628 mm²

Board Design

280W

TDP

350W

600 W

Suggested PSU

750 W

1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 12-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

8.6

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

2

ATI FireGL V7700 vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

3

AMD Radeon RX 7800 vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

4

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

5

AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

7

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

8

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

9

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs ATI Radeon HD 5450 PCI

10

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X

Related News

1

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

2

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

3

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

4

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

5

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

6

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

7

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

8

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

9

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

10

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip