CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM TITAN V CEO Edition and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (868.4GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
4904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN V CEO Edition
+2679%
14.9 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
TITAN V CEO Edition
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Graphics Card
Jun 2018
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
848 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
868.4GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
80
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
216
320
TMUs
72
128
ROPs
28
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
186.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
465.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
29.80 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
7.450 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GV100
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Volta
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
2
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 11Gbps
3
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
4
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition vs ATI FirePro V5800 DVI
5
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition vs NVIDIA A2
6
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 6510
7
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM
8
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
9
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP
10
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition vs ATI Radeon X1050
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy