NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (2000MHz vs 1531MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+257%
10.97 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
TITAN X Pascal
+203%
9844
Arc A350
3239
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
TITAN X Pascal
+224%
4812
Arc A350
1481
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 10
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
DG2-128
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
6 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
