NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

VS

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock1531MHz

More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)

Lower TDP (250W vs 275W)

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 480.4GB/s)

512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

TITAN X Pascal +27%

10.97 TFLOPS

Radeon R9 FURY X

8.602 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

TITAN X Pascal +84%

9531

Radeon R9 FURY X

5173

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

TITAN X Pascal +40%

42

Radeon R9 FURY X

30

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

TITAN X Pascal +20%

78

Radeon R9 FURY X

65

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

TITAN X Pascal +60%

128

Radeon R9 FURY X

80

TITAN X Pascal

VS

Radeon R9 FURY X

Graphics Card

Aug 2016

Release Date

Jun 2015

GeForce 10

Generation

Pirate Islands

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz

Base Clock

-

1531 MHz

Boost Clock

-

1251 MHz

Memory Clock

500 MHz

Memory

12GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR5X

Memory Type

HBM

384bit

Memory Bus

4096bit

480.4GB/s

Bandwidth

512.0GB/s

Render Config

28

SM Count

-

Compute Units

64

3584

Shading Units

4096

224

TMUs

256

96

ROPs

64

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

48 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

3 MB

L2 Cache

2 MB

Theoretical Performance

147.0 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

67.20 GPixel/s

342.9 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

268.8 GTexel/s

171.5 GFLOPS

FP16 (half)

8.602 TFLOPS

10.97 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

8.602 TFLOPS

342.9 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

537.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP102

GPU Name

Fiji

GP102-400-A1

GPU Variant

Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)

Pascal

Architecture

GCN 3.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

16 nm

Process Size

28 nm

11.8 billion

Transistors

8.9 billion

471 mm²

Die Size

596 mm²

Board Design

250W

TDP

275W

600 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (12_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.2

6.1

CUDA

-

6.4

Shader Model

6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal

3

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs Intel Arc A750

4

AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal

5

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp

6

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

7

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q

8

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs ATI Radeon HD 5830

9

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 OEM

10

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

Related News

1

The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation

2

Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits

3

Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU

4

Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4

5

AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds

6

Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory

7

AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2

8

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

9

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

10

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion