Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FirePro RG220

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FirePro RG220

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3504 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal +13612%
10.97 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
May 2010
GeForce 10
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
80
224
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
M93
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy