Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 480.4GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal +37%
10.97 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 10
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
HBM
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
4096
224
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Capsaicin
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy