Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal +1740%
10.97 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
28
SM Count
30
3584
Shading Units
240
224
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
289W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
GT200B
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy