Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
Jul 2005
GeForce 10
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
12
96
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
83W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
NV41
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Pascal
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
130 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy