NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Boost Clock1531MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+91%
10.97 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 10
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
2304
224
TMUs
144
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Ellesmere
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
16 nm
Process Size
14 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
