CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
VS
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Boost Clock1531MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+91%
10.97 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
TITAN X Pascal
VS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 10
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
28
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
36
3584
Shading Units
2304
224
TMUs
144
96
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Ellesmere
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
16 nm
Process Size
14 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
2
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp
3
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs Intel Arc A750
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
5
AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
6
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
7
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs ATI Radeon HD 3410
8
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
9
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition
10
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy