Intel UHD Graphics 32EU vs AMD FirePro A320
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 32EU and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel UHD Graphics 32EU 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 100W)
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (955MHz vs 850MHz)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
UHD Graphics 32EU
0.435 TFLOPS
FirePro A320
+68%
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
350 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
955 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
256
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.640 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.92 GTexel/s
870.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
733.4 GFLOPS
108.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Jasper Lake GT1
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A320
Generation 11.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm+
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
