Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs AMD FirePro A300
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 600 and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel UHD Graphics 600 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (5W vs 65W)
AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (905MHz vs 650MHz)
288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
UHD Graphics 600
0.125 TFLOPS
FirePro A300
+456%
0.695 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics-T
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
760 MHz
650 MHz
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
96
Shading Units
384
12
TMUs
24
2
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.300 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
7.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
249.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
124.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
5W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Gemini Lake GT1
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
Generation 9.5
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
