Home GPU Comparison Intel UHD Graphics vs AMD FirePro A300

Intel UHD Graphics vs AMD FirePro A300

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel UHD Graphics 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)
AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (905MHz vs 900MHz)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
UHD Graphics
0.23 TFLOPS
FirePro A300 +202%
0.695 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
760 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
128
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
460.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

15W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Rocket Lake GT1
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm+++
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy