Home GPU Comparison 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
216 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2008
Voodoo4-2
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
143 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

16MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
2.288GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
-
Shading Units
216
2
TMUs
72
2
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

286.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
286.0 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
171W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

VSA-101
GPU Name
GT200B
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Voodoo Scalable
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
180 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.014 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
112 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

6.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
1.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
-
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy