Home GPU Comparison 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2008
Voodoo4-2
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
166 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
2.656GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
3
-
Shading Units
120
2
TMUs
8
2
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

332.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
332.0 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

VSA-101
GPU Name
RV630
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GPU Variant
-
Voodoo Scalable
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
180 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.014 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
112 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

15W
TDP
45W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

6.0
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
1.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
-
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy