ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm vs AMD ROG Ally Extreme GPU
We compared two Game console GPUs: 512MB VRAM Xbox 360 GPU 80nm and 16GB VRAM ROG Ally Extreme GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD ROG Ally Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Xbox 360 GPU 80nm
0.24 TFLOPS
ROG Ally Extreme GPU
+3355%
8.294 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
Jun 2023
Console GPU
Generation
Console GPU
Game console
Type
Game console
-
-
-
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2700 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
240
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
8.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.59 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
518.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Xenos Falcon
GPU Name
Phoenix
Crayola 6
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.232 billion
Transistors
25.39 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
178 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
