Home GPU Comparison Intel Xe DG1 SDV vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Intel Xe DG1 SDV vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Xe DG1 SDV and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (2130MHz vs 1500MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Xe DG1 SDV
2.304 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +420%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2024
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
22
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
88
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
576.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.9 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy