Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon Pro WX 3100

GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon Pro WX 3100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Pro WX 3100 Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
387
Radeon Pro WX 3100 +222%
1248
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Lexa
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
Lexa XT
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related SoC Comparison

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy