Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Radeon Instinct MI250

Quadro K1200 vs Radeon Instinct MI250

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 500W)
Radeon Instinct MI250 Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1700MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
12800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Radeon Instinct MI250 +3832%
45260
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
208
512
Shading Units
13312
32
TMUs
832
16
ROPs
0
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy