Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro 3000M

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200 +166%
1151
Quadro 3000M
432
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
5
512
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF104
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy