Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro P620

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro P620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Quadro P620 Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1354MHz vs 1124MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.13GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
Lower TDP (40W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Quadro P620 +20%
1386
Blender
Quadro K1200
88
Quadro P620 +47%
130
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1266 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1354 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.13GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.66 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.33 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.66 GFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1386 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.33 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
40W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP107
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy