Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200 +1617%
1151
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
67
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
512
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
42W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G84
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy