Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

Quadro K1200 vs Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200 +79%
1151
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
640
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
16
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
10W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA10B
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
Unknown
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy