Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 48GB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 295W)
Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 122% (2495MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 +5227%
61320
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1855 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
96
512
Shading Units
6144
32
TMUs
384
16
ROPs
192
-
RT Cores
96
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
295W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Navi 31
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Maxwell
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy