Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro FX 3800M

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro FX 3800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200 +172%
1151
Quadro FX 3800M
422
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
128
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G92
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy