Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro 2000M

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro 2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200 +172%
1151
Quadro 2000M
422
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
512
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF106
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy