Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Tesla M2050

Quadro K1200 vs Tesla M2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)
Tesla M2050 Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200 +11%
1151
Tesla M2050
1030
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
512
Shading Units
448
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.10 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.20 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF100
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy