Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
Quadro P2000 Mobile Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1291MHz vs 1124MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Quadro P2000 Mobile +158%
2974
Blender
Quadro K1200
88
Quadro P2000 Mobile +162%
231
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
9
512
Shading Units
1152
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP106
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy