Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs RTX A4500

Quadro K1200 vs RTX A4500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 200W)
RTX A4500 Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1650MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (640.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
RTX A4500 +1954%
23650
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1050 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
640.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
56
512
Shading Units
7168
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
158.4 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
369.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.65 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
369.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA102
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy