Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro P6000

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro P6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)
Quadro P6000 Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1645MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Quadro P6000 +997%
12630
Blender
Quadro K1200
88
Quadro P6000 +837%
825
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
512
Shading Units
3840
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
96
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP102
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy