Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1455MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile +1065%
13410
Blender
Quadro K1200
88
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile +3237%
2937
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Sep 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1275 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
512
Shading Units
4608
32
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.7 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
419.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
TU102
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy