Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 80W)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1380MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +360%
5299
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
945 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
512
Shading Units
1920
32
TMUs
120
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
TU106
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy