Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro RTX 4000

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 160W)
Quadro RTX 4000 Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1545MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Quadro RTX 4000 +518%
7119
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1005 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
36
512
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
TU104
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy