Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Radeon Instinct MI300

Quadro K1200 vs Radeon Instinct MI300

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 600W)
Radeon Instinct MI300 Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1700MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
13568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Radeon Instinct MI300 +4058%
47870
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
512
Shading Units
14080
32
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
880
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
600W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
153 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy