Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Arctic Sound M

Quadro K1200 vs Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 500W)
Arctic Sound M Advantages
Released 7 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Arctic Sound M +1181%
14750
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

512
Shading Units
8192
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy