Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs RTX A2000 Embedded

Quadro K1200 vs RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 60W)
RTX A2000 Embedded Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (1612MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
RTX A2000 Embedded +617%
8253
Blender
Quadro K1200
88
RTX A2000 Embedded +2173%
2001
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
512
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA107S
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
Unknown
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy