Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Tesla PG500 216

Quadro K1200 vs Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)
Tesla PG500 216 Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1380MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Tesla PG500 216 +1127%
14130
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1260 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
512
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GV100
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy