Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Tesla S1075

Quadro K1200 vs Tesla S1075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 800W)
Tesla S1075 Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200 +85%
1151
Tesla S1075
622
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
512
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
800W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GT200B
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy