CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Apple A13 Bionic
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Apple A13 Bionic
VS
Samsung Exynos 2500
Apple A13 Bionic
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 10 cores 3200MHz Samsung Exynos 2500 vs. 6 cores 2650MHz Apple A13 Bionic . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
Samsung Exynos 2500 Advantages
Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 34.1GB/s)
Higher Frequency (3200MHz vs 2650MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 7nm)
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Score
Benchmark
AnTuTu 10
Samsung Exynos 2500
+182%
2519784
Apple A13 Bionic
891274
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Samsung Exynos 2500
+52%
2666
Apple A13 Bionic
1748
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Samsung Exynos 2500
+112%
8839
Apple A13 Bionic
4161
Samsung Exynos 2500
VS
Apple A13 Bionic
CPU
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X5
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
2x 2.65 GHz – Lightning
4x 1.6 GHz – Thunder
3200 MHz
Frequency
2650 MHz
10
Cores
6
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A
-
L2 cache
8 MB
3 nm
Process
7 nm
-
Transistor count
8.5
-
TDP
6 W
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Graphics
-
GPU name
Apple A13 GPU
-
GPU frequency
1230 MHz
-
Execution units
4
-
Shading units
64
24
Max size
4
-
FLOPS
0.6298 TFLOPS
-
Vulkan version
1.1
-
OpenCL version
2.1
-
DirectX version
12.1
Memory
LPDDR5T
Memory type
LPDDR4X
4800 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Bus
4x 16 Bit
76.8 Gbit/s
Max bandwidth
34.1 Gbit/s
AI
-
NPU
Apple Neural Engine
-
Theoretical Performance
5 TOPS
Multimedia (ISP)
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Neural Engine
UFS 4.0
Storage type
NVMe
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
2688 x 1242
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
Yes
5G support
No
-
Download speed
Up to 1200 Mbps
-
Upload speed
Up to 350 Mbps
7
Wi-Fi
6
5.4
Bluetooth
5.0
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Info
Jan 2025
Announced
Sep 2019
Flagship
Class
Flagship
Related SoC Comparison
1
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek MT6580
2
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
3
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
4
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
5
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
6
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
7
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Google Tensor G4
8
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
9
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
10
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy