Home Comparison AMD EPYC 8324PN vs Intel Xeon Phi 7290F

AMD EPYC 8324PN vs Intel Xeon Phi 7290F

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 8324PN with 32 cores 2.05GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 7290F with 72 cores 1.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 8324PN 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.05GHz vs 1.5GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (130W vs 260W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Sep 2023
Release Date
Jun 2016
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
Knights Landing
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
Intel Socket 3647
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)

Package

35.5 billions
Transistor Count
8 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
130 W
Power Consumption
260 W
85 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
4x73 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

2.05 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
1.7 GHz
32
Total Core Count
72
64
Total Thread Count
288
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
20.5
Multiplier
15.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4
6
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
-
96
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy