Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9335 vs Xeon Platinum 8280M

AMD EPYC 9335 vs Xeon Platinum 8280M

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9335 with 32 cores 3GHz and Xeon Platinum 8280M with 28 cores 2.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9335 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 2933)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3GHz vs 2.7GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 38.5MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)
Xeon Platinum 8280M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (205W vs 210W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Dec 2018
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Cascade Lake-SP
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 3647
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
Xeon Platinum(Cascade Lake-SP)

Package

33.26 billions
Transistor Count
8 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
210 W
Power Consumption
205 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
4x70.6 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

32
Performance Cores
-
64
Performance Core Threads
-
3 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
32
Total Core Count
28
64
Total Thread Count
56
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
30.0
Multiplier
27.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
38.5 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
8

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR4-2933
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
3
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy