Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9474F vs Centaur CHA

AMD EPYC 9474F vs Centaur CHA

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9474F with 48 cores 3.6GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9474F 's Advantages
Released 121 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 16nm)
Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 360W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 9474F +169%
2117
Centaur CHA
786
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 9474F +495%
23699
Centaur CHA
3982
VS

General Parameters

Nov 2022
Release Date
Jan 1901
AMD
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
CHA
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
CHA (CNS)

Package

52.56 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
70 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
8x72 mm²
Die Size
195 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

3.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
48
Total Core Count
8
96
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
36.0
Multiplier
12.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
12
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
3
128
PCIe Lanes
44

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy