Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9825 vs Opteron 152

AMD EPYC 9825 vs Opteron 152

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9825 with 144 cores 2.2GHz and Opteron 152 with 1 cores 2.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9825 's Advantages
Released 19 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 400)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 90nm)
Opteron 152 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.6GHz vs 2.2GHz)
Lower TDP (104W vs 390W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Aug 2005
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Venus
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket 939
N/A
Integrated Graphics
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
Opteron (Venus (E6))

Package

Transistor Count
0.114 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
90 nm
390 W
Power Consumption
104 W
TSMC
Foundry
-
mm²
Die Size
115 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

144
Performance Cores
-
288
Performance Core Threads
-
2.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
144
Total Core Count
1
288
Total Thread Count
1
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
13.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
128 KB
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR1-400
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
2
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy