Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9825 vs Opteron 3320 EE

AMD EPYC 9825 vs Opteron 3320 EE

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9825 with 144 cores 2.2GHz and Opteron 3320 EE with 4 cores 1.9GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9825 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2)
Higher base frequency (2.2GHz vs 1.9GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 32nm)
Opteron 3320 EE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 390W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Dec 2012
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Delhi
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket AM3+
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
Opteron (Delhi)

Package

Transistor Count
1.2 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
390 W
Power Consumption
25 W
TSMC
Foundry
-
mm²
Die Size
315 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

144
Performance Cores
-
288
Performance Core Threads
-
2.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
144
Total Core Count
4
288
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
9.5
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
192 K
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
4 MB
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR3
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
2
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
2
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy